No, Samix, I'm just having a little fun here.

"Censorship" does not exist at Bullion Bulls, nor should self-censorship -- especially with respect to the materials we BRING to the Forum. With respect to what we actually post (i.e. write) ourselves, I'm trying to be a little more nuanced.

I don't want people engaging in any broad self-censorship, but I am striving to get people to engage in just a little filtering. In other words, nothing should be edited-out "automatically" simply because it falls under some Proscribed Category (lol!).

However, where we're dealing with materials which can/are potential "tools" of propaganda/disinformation; then I would like people to exhibit care with how they use (post) such materials.

The obvious analogy here would be guns (lol!!!). Personally, I would like to see a society without guns. However, recognizing that I am not Supreme Being of the Universe (lol); I'm prepared to accept compromise -- where the "guns" are simply handled in a very careful/prudent manner.

So that is how I would like us to approach "handling" dogma/ideology: these are generally dangerous/harmful materials, so if you are going to use them, "handle them with care."

Ah sure, actually the presentation about irreducible complexity, that is why I posted it.

It appears this whole thread might be moot...or simply irrelevant.



I'm really wondering what's happening to the curiosity-level of members when stuff like this is posted and no one (else) reacts.




www.bullionbullscanada.com/bulletin-boar.../21934-transhumanism