Written by Jeff Nielson Thursday, 14 November 2013 13:30
There will be few readers who are not at least partially familiar with the stylish, thought-provoking film classic, The Matrix. For those readers not among that group; The Matrix is a sci-fi drama which postulates a future where intelligent machines have seized control of the planet, and enslaved humanity â by hooking-up all of them to a gigantic virtual-reality machine.
These human Drones (the energy-supply for the Machines) are entirely oblivious of the fantasy-world in which they dwell (as slaves). They waste away their lives, content to be Drones in the Matrix. At this point, informed readers have already heard enough to know this comes very close to describing our own âreality.â
Clearly, there is one, crucial difference: we have no secret, gigantic virtual-reality machine â into which all of the minds of humanity are plugged. No, our Matrix has been a creation of our own minds, fueled by year after year after year of saturation propaganda. Many readers will see such an allegory as hyperbolic. Not for long.
In general terms; how would we describe any fantasy-world/Matrix? While the English language is rich in adjectives, I would suggest that the following trio encapsulates the concept here completely and precisely: perverse, absurd, and unreal. Indeed, simply use those three adjectives together, and readers will deduce from the context alone that one is referring to some sort of Matrix/fantasy-world â without even the need to explicitly include any noun.
Now letâs look at the Precious Metals Matrix. The usual starting-point in this trip âthrough the Looking Glassâ is with a Â visit to the entity which claims to represent the global gold industry: the World âGoldâ Council. Recently, the WGC issued its own proclamations on third-quarter global gold demand:
Global gold demand fell by 21% year-on-year in the third quarter to 868.5 metric tons, mainly due to a further exodus out of exchange-traded funds by investors in Western nations, the World Gold Council said Thursday. [emphasis mine]
It doesnât get much clearer than that. According to the WGC, the gold market collapsed in Q3 because investors were selling a lot of âgoldâ.
What happens when you sell anything into a market? Inventories go up. What happens when you sell a lot of something (i.e. an âexodusâ)? Inventories go straight up.
What happened in the gold market during the third quarter, in the real world? Inventories went straight down. Indeed, during this entire, supposed âexodusâ out of the gold market, faithfully reported by the WGC; Comex gold inventories have plummeted now by 80%, in aggregate.
This is the Real World. A sustained collapse in gold inventories, at a rate unprecedented in the modern history of markets. There is no more single piece of conclusive evidence on the status of any market than inventories. The report by the WGC is perverse, absurd, and unreal.
There are only two possibilities in this Precious Metals Matrix of the WGC. Either everything reported by the WGC about the gold market is simply complete fabrication; or investors were selling something in Q3 (and Q2), but they werenât selling gold. In other words, some/most (all?) of these paper-gold âfundsâ are nothing but paper, paper-called-gold.
Can we be more certain about our conclusion here? How about a confession directly from the Bankers who flog this paper-called-gold that they are knowingly (i.e. fraudulently) selling paper, but calling it âgoldâ?
Written by Jeff Nielson Friday, 08 November 2013 12:18
Itâs with a heavy heart that I write this commentary: the corruption of what was formerly an entity of information and truth. My own discovery of this dirty-little-secret came personally.
For approximately four years GATA (the âGold Anti-Trust Action Committeeâ) had been publishing my commentaries, and with increasing frequency over the past year, in particular. Then, abruptly, all such publishing instantly and permanently halted.
The basis for this sudden (and total) censorship of my commentaries? I was told that âone of GATAâs most significant individual supportersâ had claimed that there were âanti-Semiticâ undertones in one of my (more than 1,000) commentaries: âThe One Bankâ.
There are numerous problems with this false-accusation, beginning with the fact that none of my commentaries (including the one in question) ever mention the ethnicity of any individuals discussed, for the simple reason that this is âanalysisâ â and only relevant data is included in such analysis.
What, then, was the basis for this false-accusation? I simply used the name of a Jewish family â Rothschild â in one commentary. There was not a single reference to their ethnicity in the entire commentary. There was not a single reference to their ethnicity in any of the research material cited in that commentary. Itâs like being accused of âhomophobiaâ for simply mentioning the name of a gay individual, even though never revealing or alluding to their sexual orientation.
Further proof comes in the fact that it took this mysterious, financial âsupporterâ of GATA an entire month to come forward with this accusation. Indeed, the accusation came immediately after a massive, sustained âcyber-attackâ directed against our website had failed to destroy it.
Additional proof comes in the fact that all my work is now censored at this now-corrupt entity, including any/all commentaries which contain no references of any kind even to the original commentary. GATA is not censoring âanti-Semitismâ; GATA is censoring âJeff Nielsonâ.
More particularly; GATA is censoring the name âRothschildâ, a family so wealthy (and powerful) that they deem it an unpardonable sin for anyone to even mention their name publicly. This naturally begs the question: what do they have to hide?
The answer to that question comes inside the very commentary which was/is the basis for my censorship: their âOne Bank.â
The very existence of the Rothschildsâ, gigantic financial monopoly â which by itself âcontrols 40%â of the global economy â is illegal. It is a violation of our âanti-trust lawsâ (ironically the very laws which GATA seeks to have enforced), which are the principle foundation of our entire, capitalist economic system. Not surprisingly; the operators of this Crime Syndicate donât want to see their illegal entity ever mentioned by any media source.
Regular readers are very familiar with the crimes of this financial cabal. (Criminal) manipulation of the $500+ trillion âLIBORâ debt market. (Criminal) manipulation of global currency markets. Serial âlaunderingâ of the money of known drug cartels, and âterroristâ organizations. (Criminal) rigging of all markets, most particularly global commodity markets.
A much more-detailed chronology of the more-than-one-hundred-year history of this ruthless Crime Syndicate can be found in the superb documentary âThe Money Masters.â The only thing ânewâ about the Rothschildsâ 21st century crimes is their sheer magnitude.