Wednesday, September 24, 2014
   
Text Size

Search our Site or Google

GATA Now Funded With Rothschilds’ Dirty Money

Articles & Blogs - Gold Commentary

User Rating: / 130
PoorBest 

It’s with a heavy heart that I write this commentary: the corruption of what was formerly an entity of information and truth. My own discovery of this dirty-little-secret came personally.

For approximately four years GATA (the “Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee”) had been publishing my commentaries, and with increasing frequency over the past year, in particular. Then, abruptly, all such publishing instantly and permanently halted.

The basis for this sudden (and total) censorship of my commentaries? I was told that “one of GATA’s most significant individual supporters” had claimed that there were “anti-Semitic” undertones in one of my (more than 1,000) commentaries: “The One Bank”.

There are numerous problems with this false-accusation, beginning with the fact that none of my commentaries (including the one in question) ever mention the ethnicity of any individuals discussed, for the simple reason that this is “analysis” – and only relevant data is included in such analysis.

What, then, was the basis for this false-accusation? I simply used the name of a Jewish family – Rothschild – in one commentary. There was not a single reference to their ethnicity in the entire commentary. There was not a single reference to their ethnicity in any of the research material cited in that commentary. It’s like being accused of “homophobia” for simply mentioning the name of a gay individual, even though never revealing or alluding to their sexual orientation.

Further proof comes in the fact that it took this mysterious, financial “supporter” of GATA an entire month to come forward with this accusation. Indeed, the accusation came immediately after a massive, sustained “cyber-attack” directed against our website had failed to destroy it.

Additional proof comes in the fact that all my work is now censored at this now-corrupt entity, including any/all commentaries which contain no references of any kind even to the original commentary. GATA is not censoring “anti-Semitism”; GATA is censoring “Jeff Nielson”.

More particularly; GATA is censoring the name “Rothschild”, a family so wealthy (and powerful) that they deem it an unpardonable sin for anyone to even mention their name publicly. This naturally begs the question: what do they have to hide?

The answer to that question comes inside the very commentary which was/is the basis for my censorship: their “One Bank.”

The very existence of the Rothschilds’, gigantic financial monopoly – which by itself “controls 40%” of the global economy – is illegal. It is a violation of our “anti-trust laws” (ironically the very laws which GATA seeks to have enforced), which are the principle foundation of our entire, capitalist economic system. Not surprisingly; the operators of this Crime Syndicate don’t want to see their illegal entity ever mentioned by any media source.

Regular readers are very familiar with the crimes of this financial cabal. (Criminal) manipulation of the $500+ trillion “LIBOR” debt market. (Criminal) manipulation of global currency markets. Serial “laundering” of the money of known drug cartels, and “terrorist” organizations. (Criminal) rigging of all markets, most particularly global commodity markets.

A much more-detailed chronology of the more-than-one-hundred-year history of this ruthless Crime Syndicate can be found in the superb documentary “The Money Masters.” The only thing “new” about the Rothschilds’ 21st century crimes is their sheer magnitude.

 

Indeed, with its obscene size; its crime-empire has now branched out into other spheres not even remotely connected with banking. One of its latest criminal escapades is sleazy, gangster-style “racketeering” in the metals warehouses it operates all over the world – but especially inside the United States.

The natural question on the minds of readers new to all of this financial malfeasance is: how do the Rothschilds get away with this ongoing Organized Crime? It certainly helps when the Attorney General of the United States – Top-Cop for “the world’s only superpower” -- is one of your employees.

Explaining how the Rothschilds can permanently perpetrate their “One Bank” crime requires nothing more than explaining why all such monopolies (and oligopolies) are illegal, in the first place. They are entirely corrupt entities, which taint anything-and-everything they touch. Obviously a monopoly which “controls” 40% of a $70-trillion global economy has more than enough “dirty money” (if it wanted to) to buy every politician on the planet – and any/all of the media entities which should be reporting on its crimes.

Putting aside the particular details of this censorship; there is a far more-disturbing principle involved here: a media-entity which allows its “editorial policy” to be dictated by a financial backer. In turn, any media entity whose “voice” has been bought is no longer a “media entity”, but rather a vessel of propaganda – where only “approved” viewpoints are presented.

Being an avid supporter of GATA (and all of its previous, important work and achievements in the precious metals sector); it is especially painful to be the Messenger reporting on this journalistic corruption. Undoubtedly my own motives here will be questioned.

My answer to such inquiries is simple. Corruption is like a “cockroach”; expose it to light and it will generally scuttle away – looking for the nearest rock to crawl under. My hope (if not expectation) is that with their funding of GATA now revealed, that the Rothschilds will cut-off their flow of dirty money.

Censorship loses much of its value to its Censorers once exposed. Indeed, the louder the question “what do they have to hide?” is asked, the more likely that censorship will blow-up in the faces of the Censorers themselves. Instead of suppressing the Secrets they seek to hide, they end up drawing attention to them.

Out of all the writers who was published at GATA; I was singled-out for permanent censorship. Why? Because I mentioned the name “Rothschild”, once. Why is no one allowed to even mention that name?

We live in (supposedly) “free societies”. Protected within these “free societies” is Free Speech. Obviously if certain words or names can not even be mentioned in our societies without attracting extreme/absolute Censorship; then our speech is no longer “free.”

Ironically, the gist of my “One Bank” commentary was that this monstrous, criminal financial entity was rapidly depriving us of our economic liberty. The One Bank has added an exclamation-point to my original message by showing it also seeks to deprive us of our political liberties – i.e. our human rights.

Trackback(0)
Comments (17)Add Comment
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 13, 2013
Editor's Note:

My censorship by GATA has now been independently confirmed/verified by GATA itself:

http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/bulletin-boards/12-gold-a-silver-talk/17250-the-daily-grind?limit=10&start=990#28995
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 11, 2013
Rothschild is the biggest bankster family the world has ever seen. How much the R family owns of each such central bank around the world is a secret. If 40% of the worlds economy the R family controls, then one can assume he owns at least 40% of the BIS in Switzerland. I think it is highly improbable that the R family owns less than 50% of BIC...


Paxjds, I think it's important to be precise here, something which hasn't really been practical within any of the commentaries on The One Bank.

When I talk about "40% control" of the global economy; I am definitely not talking about "controlling" a piece of everything. Indeed; if you only influence a piece, you don't really have "control".

Rather, what we are really talking about here is "100% control" of 40% of all sectors/markets. For example (and hypothetically): the entire financial sector (that part is certain), Big Oil, the Corporate Media, and Big Agriculture.

If JPMorgan, Exxon, the propaganda machine, Monsanto, etc. are all really just "Rothschilds", then suddenly a lot of things make a lot more sense.

As I've said in the past; there has NEVER been any "New World Order" here -- simply a very old (and very, very large) Crime Syndicate... smilies/wink.gif
paxjds1
...
written by paxjds1, November 10, 2013
Rothschild is the biggest bankster family the world has ever seen. How much the R family owns of each such central bank around the world is a secret. If 40% of the worlds economy the R family controls, then one can assume he owns at least 40% of the BIS in Switzerland. I think it is highly improbable that the R family owns less than 50% of BIC.
Several years ago I sent you info on the BIC and control of GOLD is front and center in the BY LAWS of the BIS(Bank of International Settlements).
The banksters were granted full diplomatic immunity when incorporated in app. 1928 AD. They do not pay personal taxes to any government. They get to print money, loan out the printed money, charge interest for years,...and keep printing FIAT Money.
The Hidden Ruler, The Caesar, the King, Tyrant, and Dictator are alive and well. Not much has changed with the SERFDOMS they rule, other than they ignore the Magna Charter, Constitution, and all laws set by man. Yes, above the Law they operate. They are the Law, or at least when they speak, the law jumps and changes the law to anything the banksters want. Just look at all the changers in finance law the crooks have passed since 1992 in the usa. They own most politicians.
This is not a new world order, just more of the same OLD ORDER packaged with new buzz words. GATA apparently has lost its way, and like a prodigal son, it may return as a penitent brain washed prisoner that sold his soul and seeks to re-enter the LIGHT.!
Jeff, keep up the good work.
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 09, 2013
Very sad to hear... you have some kind of stones to write the truth about this evil cabal of human filth... I cannot help but think that the total capitulation of the US main stream media to the incredible, destructive and despicable actions of our "Dear Leader" sort of fits with this scenario... all the vile scandals of Benghazi, IRS, NSA and fast and Furious are simply given short shrift, then ignored...


Don't think I deserve too much credit for courage, I haven't been left with much in the way of choices.

As my "platforms" for reaching large numbers of readers are systematically destroyed; there's nothing left for me to do but speak out -- to the remnant of audience I'm still able to reach (the Die-Hards - lol!).

The only Silver Lining in all of this is that I know my work wouldn't be attracting such extreme and sustained efforts at censorship if I wasn't on the right track... ')
Tucson JJ
...
written by JJ, November 09, 2013
Very sad to hear... you have some kind of stones to write the truth about this evil cabal of human filth... I cannot help but think that the total capitulation of the US main stream media to the incredible, destructive and despicable actions of our "Dear Leader" sort of fits with this scenario... all the vile scandals of Benghazi, IRS, NSA and fast and Furious are simply given short shrift, then ignored...

I hope that when the bond market finally goes into "hyper-collapse" mode, which may be soon... we will get some cleansing action in the area of the cancerous Big banks... as they (hopefully) collapse in a great implosion of derivatives... coupled with a collapse of the USD... keep up the great work, Jeff!
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 09, 2013
This whole thing is tawdry in the extreme. I am wondering if TPTB are beginning a new phase of attack with the demoralized gold bug community to create some mischief. I do recall a lot of cyber attacks of various web sites - including Bullionbulls now - and it may well be that getting pundits fighting with each other might be a ploy as well. Divide and conquer...


Galearis, you have articulated my own, worst fears precisely. With the sector itself at an absolute trough; the Rothschilds are seeking to at least confuse-and-demoralize (if not destroy) what remains of the Gold Bug community. And this was why I held off on writing a piece of this nature -- as a Last Resort, and certainly not the first one.

But as I noted in the commentary; Corruption cannot stand being exposed to Light. If I should at least be successful in "raising awareness" here; then long-term good could (should?) come from this commentary -- even if my own "bridges" are now burned. smilies/wink.gif

In a sense; I was always somewhat of an Outsider to this sector, as the principal focus of my writing has always been well beyond merely "precious metals." But now my Outsider-status in this sector is "official" (lol).
Galearis
...
written by Galearis, November 09, 2013
This whole thing is tawdry in the extreme. I am wondering if TPTB are beginning a new phase of attack with the demoralized gold bug community to create some mischief. I do recall a lot of cyber attacks of various web sites - including Bullionbulls now - and it may well be that getting pundits fighting with each other might be a ploy as well. Divide and conquer.

If we look at what they have accomplished, they have at least quieted a voice that may have been creating difficulties for the cartel. I consider that the structural damage to our community and a victory for the dark side. There are difficulties out there in blogville, and most of these (IMHO) involve some logic gaps around investing in mining shares, paper gold, and bail-in discussions...I am not, as you recall, highly admired at the Turd Ferguson web site for dismissing the use of TA for predicting price directions on the paper PM markets (two years of being wrong seems to teach nothing with that sub group of pundits. There are many ways to talk ones book; and I suppose most of these folks need to support themselves and their web sites,,,,,. However, avoiding the discussion of how much these markets are compromised and promoting paper assets within the areas of these credibility gaps is, to my mind, questionable also....All our favourite pundits have their blind spots and some of these blind spots are a bit too wilful or even self-serving...

Hopefully, Bullionbulls folks will be open minded with some of this. I always speak my mind and do so honestly. I am not bothered if some of this is embarrassing or disagreeable to readers; I just think that if it is pertinent and reasonable, it should be discussed...

If the system is attacking you, Jeff, you might consider it a complement. That is an accomplishment. Congrats.

Best regards,
G.
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 09, 2013
More,..

I recall that Jeff was also a highly esteemed Pog cast guess with Turd Ferguson and wonder if there is a problem there too....


I did do one pod-cast with Turd; thought it went really well, thought that T.F. himself was/is a great guy. He hasn't invited me back, but I would never insinuate anything there.

What makes the censorship with GATA striking is that I was on a steady "upward curve" getting more and more of my commentaries published there -- and then suddenly ZERO. Just like at TheStreet. Just like at Seeking Alpha...

I'm no "Don Quixote"; looking for new windmills (lol). I waited MONTHS...

http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/bulletin-boards/12-gold-a-silver-talk/26569-the-one-bank-the-one-bank-the-one-bank

...(hoping the issue would resolve itself) before I went public with this in a commentary. One of the hardest things I've ever done. smilies/sad.gif
Galearis
...
written by Galearis, November 09, 2013
More,..

I recall that Jeff was also a highly esteemed Pog cast guess with Turd Ferguson and wonder if there is a problem there too....

But I may have missed a few since he went subscription service....
G.
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 08, 2013
Wow Jeff, even Bix Weir is on your case now, in the comment section,

http://sgtreport.com/2013/11/must-read-gata-now-funded-with-rothschilds-dirty-money/

To be fair, I don`t think he read the part where you were basically slandered.

I had to reply
"Bix,

I`ve been following yourself, GATA and Jeff for three years now. I`ve learned from and respect you all. BUT something is wrong here. Jeff has been accused of anti-Semitic overtones simply by mentioning the name "Rothschild" in one article. This is known as bad-jacketing in the intelligence field and amounts to slander. I`ve seen many people accused of this simply by mentioning the word International Bankers with nary a Rothschild in sight.


Dylan, you don't write pieces like this without expecting to take some shots -- especially below the belt.

Yes, Bix Weir's diatribe does make it clear he never read my piece all the way through...perhaps he couldn't manage to get past the title (lol)?

I certainly take no joy in stirring-up controversy inside the sector. Before when I was victimized by censorship, the censorship was always coming from outside the sector. This was something which (after everything else which has transpired) I simply couldn't continue to ignore.
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 08, 2013
Hey Jeff... I find your conclusions to be quite logical and realistic. It is the same when making any serious argument against the nonsense we were told by the "authorities" regarding 9/11. If you attempt to speak the truth, you are censored, dropped, denigrated, fired or assassinated. GATA has bowed to the stronger wind and there really is no other explanation for censorship. To me that signals two things; the influence of the Rothschilds and the unhappy fact GATA, unwittingly at first perhaps, has been doing the work the Rothschilds wanted it to do unbidded; i.e. there may not have been demands made previously. Without those demands, the fact GATA was allowed to exist and go forward is actually evidence they were serving the desires of the Rothschilds and their minions the Rockefellers...


Owatica, unfortunately what makes this scenario especially clear for me personally is that this is a part of a pattern. Before GATA; I was suddenly squeezed-out at TheStreet.com. One day they're accepting EVERYTHING I submit, the next day they tell me they'll never publish another commentary.

And before that; the same thing happened at Seeking Alpha -- when I started rapidly becoming one of the most-popular writers on their site. It's nothing but Scorched Earth for anyone who wants to write the whole truth.

Those who find it easier to get published should perhaps consider themselves thankful that they aren't perceived as a "threat"... smilies/wink.gif
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 08, 2013
Not to seem argumentative about this, I'll see if Rob Kirby has any views about this....To my mind I find it difficult to believe that GATA would leave itself open to influence by a slimy bank...But it may react to a specious accusation of anti-Semitic statements. Kind of a better safe than sorry knee jerk reaction that clipped you.

I remember when my brother (handle of Rhody) used to post about lease rates etc. on Murphy's Midas column. His crime was to start talking about mining shares as derivatives and condemned them as risky investments. Well, Murphy dumped bro from the forum - but with apologies. Too many subscribers and supporters of GATA are not really gold bugs but paper dollar players. They were miffed and bro had to go. So that was a shame too. And everyones loss....Even as he has been absolutely correct....

As you recall, being correct in ones views is not a recipe for gratitude from readers (smile).

Regardless of why this happened, it is a real shame that a voice can be silenced like that....And seemingly without recourse...


Galearis, understand that what is most shameful here is how GATA was abandoned by most legitimate interests in the sector -- as soon as the "good times" dried-up in 2011. I was at a recent GATA fund-raiser, and saw firsthand how tight-fisted most of these "supporters" were.

Unfortunately, when LEGITIMATE funding dries-up, sometimes less-desirable sources will suddenly become dominant...
owatica
...
written by owatica, November 08, 2013
Hey Jeff... I find your conclusions to be quite logical and realistic. It is the same when making any serious argument against the nonsense we were told by the "authorities" regarding 9/11. If you attempt to speak the truth, you are censored, dropped, denigrated, fired or assassinated. GATA has bowed to the stronger wind and there really is no other explanation for censorship. To me that signals two things; the influence of the Rothschilds and the unhappy fact GATA, unwittingly at first perhaps, has been doing the work the Rothschilds wanted it to do unbidded; i.e. there may not have been demands made previously. Without those demands, the fact GATA was allowed to exist and go forward is actually evidence they were serving the desires of the Rothschilds and their minions the Rockefellers.

It is the same with those who are dynamically arguing "politics" who are also working for the One Bank unwittingly; i.e. they have allowed themselves to be distracted by propaganda as there are no political solutions to our difficulties and the wall to wall corruption that surrounds us. All we have is political theater and phony "elections" to gull the public. Those who are manipulated into arguing among themselves over "hot button" issues such as abortion, same sex marriage et al are ALSO 'working' for the One Bank as they are assisting the Rothschilds to achieve their ultimate goals. However, forthrightly bowing to the demand from ANYONE to censor their articles is all the "proof" anyone needs to understand the unfortunate corruption of GATA no matter how limited that corruption may be. Sorry Bix. It's not all black hats and white hats...
Dylan
...
written by Dylan, November 08, 2013
Wow Jeff, even Bix Weir is on your case now, in the comment section,

http://sgtreport.com/2013/11/must-read-gata-now-funded-with-rothschilds-dirty-money/

To be fair, I don`t think he read the part where you were basically slandered.

I had to reply
"Bix,

I`ve been following yourself, GATA and Jeff for three years now. I`ve learned from and respect you all. BUT something is wrong here. Jeff has been accused of anti-Semitic overtones simply by mentioning the name "Rothschild" in one article. This is known as bad-jacketing in the intelligence field and amounts to slander. I`ve seen many people accused of this simply by mentioning the word International Bankers with nary a Rothschild in sight.

What Jeff did was make a connection between a certain family and banking fraud.
This is no more than the best writer for GATA made in 2010 for example.

"In 1919 the major London gold dealers decided to get together in the offices of N.M. Rothschild to “fix” the price of gold each day."

You know who that was don`t you? Adrian Douglas

Gold Market is not “Fixed”, it’s Rigged
https://marketforceanalysis.com/articles/latest_article_081310.html

The Rothschilds were involved in rigging the price of gold.

There I`ve said it.

It`s like being able to say that Al Capone ran bootlegging operations but NOT that Meyer Lansky ran numbers rackets."
Galearis
...
written by Galearis, November 08, 2013
Not to seem argumentative about this, I'll see if Rob Kirby has any views about this....To my mind I find it difficult to believe that GATA would leave itself open to influence by a slimy bank...But it may react to a specious accusation of anti-Semitic statements. Kind of a better safe than sorry knee jerk reaction that clipped you.

I remember when my brother (handle of Rhody) used to post about lease rates etc. on Murphy's Midas column. His crime was to start talking about mining shares as derivatives and condemned them as risky investments. Well, Murphy dumped bro from the forum - but with apologies. Too many subscribers and supporters of GATA are not really gold bugs but paper dollar players. They were miffed and bro had to go. So that was a shame too. And everyones loss....Even as he has been absolutely correct....

As you recall, being correct in ones views is not a recipe for gratitude from readers (smile).

Regardless of why this happened, it is a real shame that a voice can be silenced like that....And seemingly without recourse.

Of a somewhat different subject I note that the take down in paper gold today was timely. The TA called for a false breakdown (happens 100% of the time since 2011 high) and the price was well into the apex of the wedge. A quick couple of ruler lines drawn and we have a breakdown out of the bottom channel of the interim head and shoulders...I am just saying this because this is the pattern they were gunning for; they got it and we see the results. The holding action continues - or we could even go down from here to the $1100 area...

Speaking of Murphy - his pod cast with Turd Ferguson today mentioned that all of our best pundits have been 100% wrong about price direction for the past year or two...I have been absolutely correct for two years.

But then again, I am not a trader, I am not a stock promoter, and therefore my objectivity is not compromised.

I plan to get into this area a lot more in the weeks to come,,,,and I suspect or hope for some robust discussions over it....But not necessarily gratitude...(Grin)

G.
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, November 08, 2013
...do you have any hard information that GATA is supported by the Rothschilds Bank?
If this is true, then GATA is very much compromised. But I do not see it in their editorial positions.



Galearis, we don't "see it" (in terms of any "eye-witness" evidence) any more than it is "seen" elsewhere -- in our governments, regulators, and media.

Rather; it is a process of deduction: "circumstantial evidence", the same form of evidence used to obtain convictions in most criminal trials.

The process is simple/basic: "means, motive, opportunity." I mention the name "Rothschild" (once), and am permanently censored as a result. Who has the only motive to censor me for my "crime"?

I learn that the censorship is the result of "a financial backer of GATA"; knowing that the Rothschilds are "proprieters" of the largest Financial Empire (financial crime syndicate) the world has ever seen. "Means" and "opportunity".

Furthermore, the act of censorship occurs immediately after weeks of sustained "cyber-attacks" on our site failed to disrupt our operations.

Means, motive, opportunity. That's how they do it in our criminal justice system. What I'm lacking is the near-infinite resources of a police force to then go out and gather further evidence to support means, motive, and opportunity -- to obtain a "conviction".

But convictions involve "proof beyond a reasonable doubt". That's not the standard of proof required of me (or any other writer). Our standard of proof is "the balance of probabilities": am I more likely right or wrong?
Galearis
...
written by Galearis, November 08, 2013
Hmmm,

The only access to log in is with FireFox. Explorer is useless.

The other point is a question: do you have any hard information that GATA is supported by the Rothschilds Bank?
If this is true, then GATA is very much compromised. But I do not see it in their editorial positions.

G.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Latest Commentary

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

Latest Comments

Disclaimer:

BullionBullsCanada.com is not a registered investment advisor - Stock information is for educational purposes ONLY. Bullion Bulls Canada does not make "buy" or "sell" recommendations for any company. Rather, we seek to find and identify Canadian companies who we see as having good growth potential. It is up to individual investors to do their own "due diligence" or to consult with their financial advisor - to determine whether any particular company is a suitable investment for themselves.

Login Form