Thursday, March 05, 2015
Text Size

Search our Site or Google

U.S. Launches New Wave of Economic Terrorism

Articles & Blogs - US Commentary

User Rating: / 22

When Ben Bernanke announced more money-printing with his $600 billion in “quantitative easing”, it highlighted two of the the many, enormous economic lies perpetuated by the U.S. government. First, it officially put to rest the idiotic fiction that the Federal Reserve had an “exit strategy” (other than simply more and more money-printing until the U.S. economy collapses).

The second lie that was exposed was the supposed, eternal commitment of the U.S. to a “strong dollar”. Understand that in Bernanke’s own words, more “QE” was necessary to “increase inflation”, and increasing inflation is identical to weakening the U.S. dollar, being merely the other side of the same “coin”.

With those illusions ripped-away from the legions of market-chumps who continued to believe in U.S. propaganda, the U.S. dollar began another nose-dive. And within days of that collapse beginning, the U.S. propaganda-machine (with a helping hand from the UK) began another wave of Euro fear-mongering – in what is clearly “déjà vu all over again” (see U.S. Economic Terrorism: The New Winning Trade”).

Regular readers have already read this “script” before, almost exactly a year ago. The U.S. dollar was plunging against all other currencies, when one morning the U.S. media announced there was a “Euro debt crisis”. From that point, nine months of around-the-clock propaganda followed, “predicting” all manner of “defaults”, economic collapses, and even the disintegration of the EU itself.

Obviously it takes more than mere words to engage in economic terrorism, that’s where the amoral psychopaths of Wall Street enter the picture. Using the “financial weapons of mass destruction” which Warren Buffet warned us about many years ago, Wall Street traders piled-into the extremely leveraged credit-default swap market – and started placing massive bets against European solvency.

Note that in the corrupt, unregulated world of U.S. derivatives (i.e. Wall Street’s private casino), that players are allowed to make huge bets on sovereign debt which severely influence those markets – even though these bankers are not parties to the actual sovereign borrowing, themselves. Furthermore, unlike any other kind of “gambling” in existence, merely placing very large bets against the solvency of European governments directly undermines their solvency.

Because these Wall Street bets are part of global debt markets, merely piling onto one side of a bet strongly influences perceived risk – and thus directly affects interest rates. In other words, the bigger the bets against (for example) Greek solvency, the higher that Greek borrowing costs surged. Obviously, a nation that was struggling to stay solvent when borrowing all its money at 3% is much closer to insolvency when those borrowing costs spike (almost overnight) to 6 – 8%.

In other words, simply placing large enough “bets” against the solvency of any of these fragile economies becomes (literally) a self-fulfilling prophecy, not because the fundamentals of these economies have changed, but totally due to Wall Street leveraging massive bets against these governments. This is nothing less than the criminal manipulation of international debt markets.

As a reminder, we already know that the credit default swap market is roughly $60 trillion in size – equivalent to global GDP. When you intentionally leverage a market of that size against an economy the size of that of Greece (less than 0.1% as large as the global economy), this is nothing less than an “attack” on Greece’s debt-markets, and an attempt to destroy Greece’s economy.

The only difference between the new attack, and the attack commenced one year ago, is that the primary focal point has shifted from Greece to Ireland. Other than that, this is an exact repeat of that one year-old script. While this represents nothing but a “winning trade” to Wall Street’s economic terrorists, tens of millions of Europeans have already had their prosperity destroyed by these psychopaths, and apparently they intend to continue playing this game until the entire U.S. financial sector is “quarantined” from the rest of the global economy.

It is in this respect that Wall Street bankers once again clearly demonstrate their psychopathic compulsions. Obviously, whether they actually “succeed” in destroying one or more of these economies, or not, what the Oligarchs are definitely “destroying” is another one of their own markets. Indeed, Wall Street is almost forcing draconian action by the EU as a whole: such as unilaterally repudiating all credit default swap contracts, and banning all U.S. financial institutions from participating in Euro debt markets.

If such measures sound “unthinkable”, compare that with how “unthinkable” it is to allow a small group of economic terrorists to go around destroying the economies of its friends.


Comments (2)Add Comment
Jeff Nielson
written by Jeff Nielson, November 18, 2010
Samix, thanks for the question, as perhaps I didn't review that part of the picture in this latest piece.

The "weapon of choice" for Wall Street's economic terrorists are credit-default swaps. This is a form of "insurance". And like all insurance, it amounts to a "bet". With one side (the insurer) betting that some default-event WON'T occur, while the other side (the economic terrorists) "bet" that a default WILL occur.

Simply piling up bets on the "will default" side of the credit-default swaps automatically pushes up interest rates - since rising bets on the "will default" side are INTERPRETED as "worry" about default.

Thus, unlike any other form of gambling in existence, placing MASSIVE bets on one side of the "equation" becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, since as I already pointed out before, if "someone" did to the U.S. what the U.S. has done to Greek and Ireland that the U.S. economy would go "poof" overnight - as much higher interest rates would INSTANTLY bankrupt the U.S. economy.
written by sameer, November 18, 2010
Hey Jeff,

Can you please explain the technicalities of placing a bet 'against' or 'for' an entity, I have always read this but never understood how it is actually done ?

like how to they place bets and what is meant by bets in this case.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.


Latest Commentary

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

Latest Comments

Disclaimer: is not a registered investment advisor - Stock information is for educational purposes ONLY. Bullion Bulls Canada does not make "buy" or "sell" recommendations for any company. Rather, we seek to find and identify Canadian companies who we see as having good growth potential. It is up to individual investors to do their own "due diligence" or to consult with their financial advisor - to determine whether any particular company is a suitable investment for themselves.

Login Form